Showing posts with label ships. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ships. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

What Is The Navy Coming To?

The commanding officer of the USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51), E. J. McClure, was recently relieved of command for "loss of confidence in her ability to command." That's right — her. What's the matter with the Navy. Aren't there enough real men to command these ships?

It was a sad day, IMHO, when women were allowed on combatant ships. I am glad I didn't have to serve alongside them. I have no problem with women serving in our armed forces. Just keep them off the ship I'm on.

Yeah, I'm not being PC. I hate being PC. Why do we have to suppress our opinions to please a bunch of lily-livered men who haven't got enough manhood to tell the women when enough is enough? Women do not belong in combat. Period! Women do not belong on combat ships. Period! Women are not warriors. Oh, I forgot about the Amazons. Well, let them be warriors if they are willing to give up a breast like the Amazons did.

I have nothing against E. J. McClure. From what I have read she is an outstanding officer. There's no doubt in my mind that she is not fully capable of commanding a line ship. My issue is that she shouldn't be.

So I'm a relic. Ask me if I care. I was a knuckle-dragging size 2 hat Torpedoman's Mate and proud of it. That was until I found out they now have skirts as torpedomen.

I don't go along with the women's lib thing. There are things men should be doing and there are things that women should be doing. And there are things that both can be doing.

I can remember the first time I went into a barbershop and saw a woman barber. I waited until the male barber finished his customer. No way was I going to allow a woman to cut my hair. Well, as it turns out, women are just as good as (if not a whole lot better than) male barbers. Since that initial shocked reaction I have had my hair cut many times by women. So, you see, I am not blindly anti-woman and I can change my mind.

I once had a female hard-working marine machinist partner that was just as good as any man marine machinist that I have met. She could do everything I could do and probably a bit more. She owned her own D-7 Caterpillar tractor and repaired and maintained it herself. But she paid a price for working in a man's world — she lost her femininity.

The pro-women element can argue all they want. They will never convince me that it is right and proper for a woman to command a warship. They will never convince me that it is right and proper for women to be in combat.

A woman soldier was recently laid to rest and the media pundits made such a big deal over this young woman's tragic death. It is tragic and I feel for the family. The tragedy is that it did not have and should not have had to happen. However, she chose to put herself in harm's way, to take on a role that men have been more-than-willing to fill for eons. She did what was not necessary nor expedient. Unfortunately we cannot have it both ways. You cannot have women exposed to combat and not expect them to be killed.

Some think the Navy brass relieving Captain McClure for grounding her ship was harsh. It was. She may not have been the one that made the mistake, but she was in command and it is the captain's responsibility to stay afloat. Captain McClure has just joined the ranks of many others who have had the misfortune to lose their commands for running their ships aground. Welcome to a man's world!

Thursday, August 30, 2007

"Loss of Confidence" in the Navy

What is going on in the United States Navy? There seems to be an epidemic of commanding officers being relieved for "loss of confidence in ... ability to command."

A quick search of the Internet revealed these incidents:

September 2002 CO, USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) relieved for loss of confidence. This man was a Captain

February 2003 CO, Kitty Hawk Battle Group, relieved for loss of confidence because of an inappropriate relationship with a female officer. This man, a Rear Admiral, also received a punitive letter of reprimand.

April 2004 CO, USS Firebolt (PC 10), relieved for loss of confidence after his ship collided with a navigational aid off the coast of Iraq.

February 2005 CO, USS San Francisco (SSN 711) relieved for loss of confidence and issued a letter of reprimand after his submerged submarine collided with a sea mount.

May 2005 CO, USS Patriot (MCM 7), a mine countermeasures ship relieved for loss of confidence after running aground in the Republic of Korea. He also received a punitive letter of reprimand.

January 2006 CO, USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) relieved for loss of confidence.

June 2006 CO, USS Columbus (SSN 762) relieved for loss of confidence after allegations of harassment disclosed.

November 2006 Commander, Submarine Squadron 17 relieved for loss of confidence in his ability to command. The charges against this Captain, who was addressed as Commodore, have not been specified.

January 2007 CO, USS Minneapolis - St. Paul (SSN 708), relieved for loss of confidence after 2 sailors died after they were washed overboard.

April 2007 CO, Electronic Attack Squadron 140, relieved for loss of confidence only 9 days after assuming command.

May 2007 CO, USS Higgins (DDG 76), relieved for loss of confidence while en route to the Persian Gulf.

May 2007 CO, USS Helena (SSN 725), relieved for loss of confidence.

May 2007 CO, USS Constitution, relieved for loss of confidence.

There may be more, who knows?

Some of these have been removed for obvious reasons, others for undisclosed causes. Primary causes for removal from command are unsafe actions, misuse of funds, sexual indiscretion, and other inappropriate conduct. I suspect that nowadays some are removed for not being PC. The number of captains being relieved for loss of confidence is alarming. They did not get their by mischance. These are men that have years of schooling and experience. They have been to PCO (Prospective Commanding Officer) School or its equivalent. Those of senior rank have attended the Naval War College. If the caliber of our officers is so degraded that our best are bad, what does that say for the junior ranks? Something is amiss. The Navy has lost its moorings in more ways than one.