Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Margarine vs. Butter

The New York Times has an article in today’s on-line edition titled, “The Claim: Margarine Is Healthier Than Butter.” I am sure that it will generate no little discussion.

Cube of butter or oleo on open wrapper

Margarine proponents like to talk about its low cholesterol ratings and lack of saturated fats. Butter proponents like to talk about its lack of trans fats. I couldn't care less about those things. I use butter because it tastes better and it is natural. I figure, if God made it it cannot be all that bad. Margarine is made by chemists and mad scientists. That makes it suspect, in my book.

I am old enough to remember when margarine had no coloring and little flavor. It looked like grease and tasted like grease. Yuk! Little packages of food coloring were supplied because people did not like what they saw. Pennsylvania's pure food laws put a big crimp on margarine sales back in the forties and fifties, because long after other states allowed food coloring to be integrated into the margarine before sales, Pennsylvania did not.

Stuart Hill has an excellent blog entry on this very matter. I recommend your reading it. The gist of his article is that the food and drug industries are in cahoots to keep us dependent on them. There may be some merit to that. I believe the food and drug developers have bought out the Food and Drug Administration. Why else would the FDA allow rapeseed, a known carcinogen to be sold for human consumption in the form of Canola Oil? Why else would a known poison like Aspartame be allowed in products designed for human consumption?

If you eat a balanced diet, butter is not going to adversely affect your cholesterol levels. Eighty percent of the body's cholesterol is self-produced and does not come from ingested sources. I am going to die someday and cholesterol may be the cause, but at least I will die happy eating the things I like rather than some chemist's greasy paste.

Monday, October 15, 2007

This is America, so Speak English

“This is America, so speak English!” I cannot tell you how many times I have heard that statement. It has most often been spoken in conversation between Americans discussing the many immigrants that cannot or will not speak English. I think it is an unkind, knee-jerk, redneck reaction to a non-problem.

Why do immigrants and foreigners not speak English?

1. They are visitors from another country here on business or vacation. Why should they learn English just to spend their money in our country? Those redneck rubes that think they should have no trouble accepting their dollars. Not only that, they (the rubes) do not learn Spanish to go to Mexico or French to visit Paris. No, they think everybody should bow to their backwoods philosophy — except themselves.

2. They are recent arrivals and have not yet had time to learn our language. Give them a break, for Pete’s sake! English is not an easy language to master. Ten-to-one, those that have no mercy on others have no mastery of their own language.

I worked in an industrial bakery and was one of eight native English-speaking employees on my shift. Of the three hundred plus others most were Mexican, with a scattered representation from the other Central and South American countries. Many of them were bilingual, most were not. “This is America, so speak English!” was often thrown in their faces.

Although it was not required, I made an attempt to learn Spanish so I could better communicate with them. One night, a young Mexican male was pulling a large motor across the plant floor by the cord. In order to get it to change direction, he sped up and yanked on the cord. I was livid because I was the one who would have to repair it. I lashed into him, speaking English, only to see a face that obviously was not comprehending. “¿Habla inglés?” He shook his head from side to side. After getting his supervisor and instructing the man on how to move electrical equipment I told him that if he was going to live and work in the United States he would always have menial jobs unless he learned English. He started immediately.

In exchange for help learning Spanish I agreed to tutor several in English. I soon learned that we often take for granted common words and idioms. One day a young man from Nicaragua asked me what “left” meant. I explained to him that it is a direction. “You can go left or you can go right,” I said while pointing in the direction indicated. “That doesn’t make sense,” he responded. “Well, use it in a sentence.” He said, “I was at the green grocers today and asked for a dozen eggs and the man said he only had three left.”

3. When foreigners are among their own people, they will speak their native language because it is more convenient and quicker for them. I know it is irritating to be among people whom you do not understand. However, we like English because it is what we know. And, when overseas and in a country that speaks another tongue, we find conversation with someone else who can speak English refreshing. Speaking one’s own language is comforting.

4. Foreigners often will not speak English for fear of making mistakes. I can understand this. I used to have a fair understanding of German and can still carry on a conversation. I sat on an airplane behind a group from Germany and translated to my wife what they were saying. It was really funny because they were drunk and did not know I could understand. My wife suggested I talk to them, but I declined because I knew my command of the language was so inferior to theirs.

4. By speaking their mother tongue they can keep you paranoid, wondering what about you they are talking about. I'd almost bet this is the primary reason. Now, that’s tongue-in-cheek but to hear some people talk that’s really the way it is.

I do believe we should have one national language and that language should be English. I believe that those who come here to live and to work and that speak another language should make due haste to learn English. I do not believe that our governments should have to print instructions in twenty languages to mollify those who cannot speak English. But if we want to enjoy an influx of tourists and their dollars businesses and public conveniences should attempt to communicate with them in their language, if those concerns so desire.

I once visited Montreal and asked a policeman for directions. Even though I was wearing the uniform of an American serviceman he spoke to me in French. I was infuriated. English is one of the two national languages of Canada. The entire time I was in Montreal I heard no English apart from the World’s Fair or aboard ship. I did not expect the man in the street to know English and perhaps the policeman was not bilingual. I learned what it was like to be a foreigner unable to communicate.

Too many Americans expect foreigners to do what they will not. How many Americans are bilingual? The percentage is less than that of other lands. In many countries Americans are sought after by the natives so they can practice their English language skills.

I have learned that immigrants who have a non-English heritage love to hear their heart language. It takes little effort to learn a few polite phrases like “Good morning, hello, how are you?” Speaking to them in their own tongue paves the way for friendship and understanding. It may also open the door to assimilation. A little effort and a little understanding goes a long way. Now, if only I could master “Good morning” in Korean....

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Red Bull Energy Drink


I was given a can of Red Bull a few weeks ago. I'm not sure why I was given it. Perhaps my benefactor thought I was a little drained. I have seen others drinking Red Bull and had often wondered what it was. I thought maybe it was a malt liquor or some other intoxicating beverage. It is neither.

I placed the can in the refrigerator and tried to forget about it. Did I really want to drink it? It looked suspicious. The can was smaller than that of a 12 oz. soda pop so it couldn't be a soft drink. One day I picked it up and noticed the small print that said "Energy Drink." Hmmn, so that's what it is. I returned it to its place in the refrigerator.

Several times over the next weeks my wife would ask, "Have you drunk that energy drink yet?" And my answer was always, "No." Every now and then I'd pick the can up, look it over, and set it back down.

"What did it taste like?" I asked myself. "Have you ever heard anybody say they liked this stuff?" I'd continue in my mental conversation.

I finally opened the can. With great deliberation I poured the nectar into a glass. In a different glass container it would easily have been mistaken for a urine sample. Did I really want to drink this? I picked the glass up and turned it slowly in my hand, examining the contents for anything suspicious. Bringing it to my nose, I sniffed it gently. I took a sip. It was carbonated. It tasted like medicine. I tried to analyze the flavor and finally concluded it came in somewhere as a cross between Alka Seltzer Plus and Gatorade.

I do not believe any claims were made about the taste but it is supposed to be an energy drink. It didn't do anything for me — at least it had no noticeable effect. Oh well, it didn't cost me anything and didn't hurt me. That's a plus. However, it definitely will not be on my grocery list.

Monday, October 8, 2007

Check Your Sources

I recently received this in an email. The first part, relative to Alexander Tyler, I have read before. The statistics regarding the last Presidential election I had not seen nor do I know if they are factual. Anyway, I checked with a usually reliable source and found that, as with so many of this type of email, there are some truths, some lies, and some distortions.

One of the places I checked is http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp. I thought I smelled a rat when I noticed that Professor Olsen (a real person) taught at Hemline University School of Law. Hemline? It turns out that Professor Olson did not do the research, there are inaccuracies in the research, and Alexander Tyler is not the correct person. Read the Snopes.com article for a fuller explanation.

While it is probable that the facts regarding a democratic state are true or plausible, the cause being heralded is done no good through shoddy journalism (or whatever you want to call it). The conclusion to the email is definitely true, regardless of the errors in the preceding paragraphs.

Here is the email:

About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government."

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury."

"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years."

"During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:

1. from bondage to spiritual faith;
2. from spiritual faith to great courage;
3. from courage to liberty;
4. from liberty to abundance;
5. from abundance to complacency;
6. from complacency to apathy;
7. from apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage"

Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:

Number of States won by:
Gore: 19
Bush: 29

Square miles of land won by:
Gore: 580,000
Bush: 2,427,000

Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million
Bush: 143 million

Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Gore: 13.2
Bush: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA as we know it in as few as five years.